$2,500 · 1 week

Roadmap Sprint

A week to establish where you actually stand on AI security and what to do in what order. It is the right starting point if you know the questions are coming but not what they’ll surface.

Price
$2,500
Timing
1 week
Best for
Teams mapping their first AI security questions
Deliverable
A prioritized roadmap your team owns
An asymmetrical map of an AI system connected to model, tools, data, identity, and human approval surfaces.
Map the surface first, then put the work in the right order.

What this covers

A structured look at what AI surface you’re actually running: where models touch untrusted input, what tools they can call, what data they can reach, mapped against what a review or a questionnaire will ask.

What you get

You’ll receive a prioritized AI security roadmap covering the risks that matter most, the controls to address them, key dependencies, and what to do now, next, and later. The result is a practical plan your security, engineering, product, and governance teams can assign and execute together.

Who this is for

A team that suspects AI security is about to matter, perhaps because a first agent is shipping or a customer is starting to ask questions, but doesn’t yet know what shape the risk takes.

Who this isn’t for

If you already know specifically what needs a deep technical look, skip ahead to the AI Security Review. The Sprint would just tell you what you already know.

Questions

What happens after the week? Do I have to hire you for the follow-on work?

No. The plan is written so your team can execute it or hand it to whoever you choose. If you want the Review or the retainer afterward, that’s your call, not a built-in upsell.

Is this a lighter version of the full review?

No. It’s a different deliverable. The Review goes deep on one system’s technical findings; the Sprint maps the whole landscape and orders the priorities. Some teams do the Sprint first and the Review later; that’s a normal path, not a requirement.

How much access do you need for a one-week engagement?

Enough to see the shape of what’s running: architecture docs, a list of what’s shipped and what’s next, and a couple of working sessions with whoever owns the AI features. Less deep than the full Review, by design.